Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.
Every "form of energy" is the conceptual product of a series of coherent relationships generated between elements actively patterned about a moment of observation and subjective interpretation.
Patterned forms of energy in motion (EIM) appear to be aware/conscious when observed in a context to which they respond.
"Our discovery of this slime mold's use of biomechanics to probe and react to its surrounding environment underscores how early this ability evolved in living organisms, and how closely related intelligence, behavior, and morphogenesis are. In this organism, which grows out to interact with the world, its shape change is its behavior. Other research has shown that similar strategies are used by cells in more complex animals, including neurons, stem cells, and cancer cells. This work in Physarum offers a new model in which to explore the ways in which evolution uses physics to implement primitive cognition that drives form and function," said corresponding author Mike Levin, Ph.D., a Wyss Associate Faculty member who is also the Vannevar Bush Chair and serves and Director of the Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University.
Thinking without a brain: Studies in brainless slime molds reveal that they use physical cues to decide where to grow.
* * *
Change is a given. In the quest for balance and harmony energy adapts to every circumstance seen and unseen, tangible and intangible. Attraction and repulsion are attributes of necessity, conformity and survival along with a dependency upon the situation between an observer and the context in which that "observation" is made.
"Fractalization" is a process that supports both fragmentation/repulsion (Yang, -) and attraction/cohesion (Yin, +), impulses and impressions whose explanation and interpretation are dependent upon the contexts in which they are observed and infused.
"Altogether, these and other papers allowed Fargues and Scholze to devise an entirely new way of defining a geometric object. Imagine that you start with an unorganized collection of points — a “cloud of dust,” in Scholze’s words — that you want to glue together in just the right way to assemble the object you’re looking for. The theory Fargues and Scholze developed provides exact mathematical directions for performing that gluing and certifies that, in the end, you will get the Fargues-Fontaine curve. And this time, it’s defined in just the right way for the task at hand — addressing the local Langlands correspondence.
“That’s technically the only way we can get our hands on it,” said Scholze. “You have to rebuild a lot of foundations of geometry in this kind of framework, and it was very surprising to me that it is possible.”
New Shape Opens “Wormhole” Between Numbers and Geometry https://www.quantamagazine.org/with-a-new-shape-mathematicians-link-geometry-and-numbers-20210719/
“… spacetime cannot be dealt with using traditional Euclidean geometry and instead must be viewed with the more complex hyperbolic geometry. Crystals contain repeating arrangement of atoms, and in recent years scientists have explored the concept of time crystals, in which the state of a material changes and repeats in time as well, like a dance. However, time is disconnected from space in those formulations. The method developed by Gopalan would allow for a new class of spacetime crystals to be explored, where space and time can mix.”
Spacetime crystals proposed by placing space and time on an equal footing.
Eternal Change for No Energy: A Time Crystal Finally made Real
https://www.quantamagazine.org/first-time-crystal-built-using-googles-quantum-computer-20210730/
Singularity describes a commonly shared coherency between complementary differences that in turn describe itself.
Fractalization describes a particular POV embraced and/or perceived within the parameters of a particular space (dimension) and time. Fractalization is a form of light reflection and refraction. Resolution as to whether this position (POV) will remain permanent is difficult to imagine and/or conceive considering change is forever.
Consider the concept of a soul as being a subconsciously recognizable and metaphorically interpreted state of awareness; a form of collective consciousness made apparent by means of its attraction about a common thread (vector), pattern, identity or central energy source. The soul is an attribute of self consciousness. The soul is self aware and integral part of a greater collective consciousness.
Discovered by means of symbol and metaphor (design), a soul might be likened to a fractal, a collective state of awareness in perpetual change and cyclical iteration.
Soul consciousness describes a fractal dimension that makes its presence "felt" from within the depths of a quantum field of virtual potential.
The soul describes a state of collective presence, a commonly shared iteration and coherency made apparent in the form of frequency and vibration. The soul's "presence" reveals a series of fractal iterations between the known and the unknown, meaning and purpose and the cycle of Life. The idea of a soul emerges as result of a series of designed impressions/iterations in pursuit of unification through incremental expansion inferred by means of a closed loop system or process. The soul describes a collectively based Self identity founded upon past and current events and experiences as viewed from the perspective of an observer.
Design consciousness brings to awareness the sense of a pattern within every iteration emerging in reference to a broadly presented blueprint (algorithm). A fractal set within a fractal set generates a transition of energy in motion from one state, i.e. frame of reference, to another - from macro to micro to macro etc. ad infinitum.
A fractal set is linear in expression and designed to never to return to the original equation, rather this method is designed to expand upon an equation, or process, of the first order. Creatively speaking linear methods may in time, eventually lead to formative ideas in the process of repeatedly and methodically pursuing the multidimensional realms and reflections of conceptual thought, feeling and impression.
Conceptual pursuits tend to harmonize the transition and transformation of energy originating from within the context/medium of fractalization.
Each family unit is a fractal construct, i,e, an agent, agency or a self copy of a common “source” or parentage. Each fractal unit is a microcosmic representation (symbol) of an algorithm of infinite character, quality without measure.
Bioengineers Develop Algorithm to Compare Cells Across Species – With Striking Results
* * *
Coherentism and Fractals
In philosophical epistemology, there are two types of coherentism: the coherence theory of truth;[1] and the coherence theory of justification[2] (also known as epistemic coherentism).[3]
Coherent truth is divided between an anthropological approach, which applies only to localized networks ('true within a given sample of a population, given our understanding of the population'), and an approach that is judged on the basis of universals, such as categorical sets. The anthropological approach belongs more properly to the correspondence theory of truth, while the universal theories are a small development within analytic philosophy.
The coherentist theory of justification, which may be interpreted as relating to either theory of coherent truth, characterizes epistemic justification as a property of a belief only if that belief is a member of a coherent set. What distinguishes coherentism from other theories of justification is that the set is the primary bearer of justification.[4]
As an epistemological theory, coherentism opposes dogmatic foundationalism and also infinitism through its insistence on definitions. It also attempts to offer a solution to the regress argument that plagues correspondence theory. In an epistemological sense, it is a theory about how belief can be proof-theoretically justified.
Coherentism is a view about the structure and system of knowledge, or else justified belief. The coherentist's thesis is normally formulated in terms of a denial of its contrary, such as dogmatic foundationalism, which lacks a proof-theoretical framework, or correspondence theory, which lacks universalism. Counterfactualism, through a vocabulary developed by David K. Lewis and his many worlds theory[5] although popular with philosophers, has had the effect of creating wide disbelief of universals amongst academics. Many difficulties lie in between hypothetical coherence and its effective actualization. Coherentism claims, at a minimum, that not all knowledge and justified belief rest ultimately on a foundation of noninferential knowledge or justified belief. To defend this view, they may argue that conjunctions (and) are more specific, and thus in some way more defensible, than disjunctions (or).
After responding to foundationalism, coherentists normally characterize their view positively by replacing the foundationalism metaphor of a building as a model for the structure of knowledge with different metaphors, such as the metaphor that models our knowledge on a ship at sea whose seaworthiness must be ensured by repairs to any part in need of it. This metaphor fulfills the purpose of explaining the problem of incoherence, which was first raised in mathematics. Coherentists typically hold that justification is solely a function of some relationship between beliefs, none of which are privileged beliefs in the way maintained by dogmatic foundationalists. In this way universal truths are in closer reach. Different varieties of coherentism are individuated by the specific relationship between a system of knowledge and justified belief, which can be interpreted in terms of predicate logic, or ideally, proof theory.[6]
1. The Coherence Theory of Truth (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
2. ^ Jump up to:a b Coherentist Theories of Epistemic Justification (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
3. ^ Paul K. Moser (1986), "Epistemic Coherentism and the Isolation Objection", Grazer Philosophische Studien 27:83–99.
4. ^ Klein, P. D. (2007). Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning. Philosophical Studies, 134 (1), 1-17.
5. ^ Lewis, David K. Counterfactuals. Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.
6. ^ Ángel Garrido, Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present, Birkhäuser, 2018, p. 510.
"Coherentism is a theory of epistemic justification. It implies that for a belief to be justified it must belong to a coherent system of beliefs. For a system of beliefs to be coherent, the beliefs that make up that system must “cohere” with one another."
Fractals can be paradoxical, inconsistent, incomprehensible and at time self-contradictory. Fractals exist in a dimension of their own and never end until their cycle is over. Upon repetition every fractal unit maximizes its pattern, i.e. self-similar methodology, while retaining its position as an integral component of a system of growth and permutation stemming from an observation, point of origin, equation or algorithm.
Every iteration is a type of permutation, both are agents of change based upon an observer's POV and the arrangement/situation/circumstance/context being perceived/witnessed/scrutinized and/or discerned.
Iterations of these patterns are sensitive to the context/environment from which they emerge. Iterations of this commonly shared pattern/algorithm react to every situation by responding to the domain, realm, framework and/or environment from which they emerge or seemingly appear (see consubstantiality).
The design process might be described as a series of iterations based upon a common theme (algorithm). The focus will vary based upon the contexts/dimensions encountered. This is one reason why design should never be compromised, rather every design/designer should emerge/willingly work within contextual constraints.
Fractals are products of a linear, closed loop mathematical process that result in a series of computational iterations, shapes and forms.
"A fractal is a shape made of parts similar to the whole in some way."
Benoit Mandelbrot
Fractals both fold and unfold by virtue of a series of mathematical designs that cannot be entirely measured. Changing points of view are purposely determined and embraced within the context of every event and experience. Fractal observations are based upon a mathematical function/rule - products of a closed-loop methodology made dimensionally apparent through a prescribed process/algorithm; an ever-changing pattern of energy that develops in incremental stages (evolution/involution).
Fractal geometry is the fruit of a linear process that allows for the expansion and/or contraction (attraction/repulsion) of awareness and focus. The mathematical rule (algorithm) describes a cyclical process, a feedback loop of conscious awareness made cognizant by means of shape and form development.
Design consciousness brings to awareness the space and time between fractal gaps, dimensions, cycles, perturbations and turbulence. By nature fractals appear to be patterned about specific constraints (blueprints). Fractals symbolize the linear generation of a never ending awareness/focus by means of impressions based upon the perceptions of an observer. Mathematical formulas create the field of engagement and consequence, patterns of energy made to bring fruition to the feelings, desires and intentions of a creative source/designer.
“The world is the mirror for you to truly see. Any strong reaction to a person or event signals an issue to work on in yourself. Be willing to examine and utilize what you see in your mirrors, in order to transform dysfunctional belief systems, negative thought forms, and fixed patterns. In the Hall of Mirrors there is no good or bad, no right or wrong – there is only the reflection of what is.”
https://spiritlibrary.com/gillian-macbeth-louthan/white-magnetic-mirror-day-out-of-time-july-25-2021
Fractal geometry demonstrates that every perceivable "source" code contains the innate potential to reproduce, evolve and multiply both from within and beyond its own particular geometry thereby adapting to its own innate environment. By means of cyclic repetition certain connoted patterns of energy appear to reproduce, multiply and regenerate themselves within the dynamic at-traction between the observer and the observed, i.e. subject and object.
Over time these re-calibrations generate more complicated, mystifying and unintelligible phenomenon, the unknown becomes more complex, unmeasurable, intricate, detailed and convoluted than anticipated. The original "situation" is forever changing and constantly being altered in the form of an emerging process. The concepts of time and space become changed and altered, dimensions expand and contract within the definition of an Euclidean space without pre-knowledge or notice while retaining a degree of constancy within the modus operandi. One might describe the fractal phenomenon as a process of internal discovery and external expansion immersed in a silent symbolic awareness and dimensional consciousness typical of every design cycle.
“To put simply, we can never reach the fundamental components of a figure that is a fractal; we can only observe smaller and smaller “worlds” (patterns in the figure that continue for infinity). For our purposes, therein lies our definition of a fractal. It is a geometrical object comprised of infinitely many “worlds.”
Georg Cantor, Musings of a Math Nerd, Fractal Geometry: Mathematics of the Future (Part1)
https://sites.psu.edu/musingsofamathnerd/2012/10/10/fractal-geometry-mathematics-of-the-future-part-i/
When observed from a central POV every fractal set displays an infinite pattern and quality in the form of a unique perspective in reference to the concepts of balance and symmetry. The observer jettisons a certain POV into a repetitive dimensional kaleidoscope filled with parts that mimic the whole by endlessly changing references to the context/environment in which such events and experiences are observed.
Individual sets (POV) act as agents, observers and facilitators whose arrangements can be mapped for specific purposes/designs and thereby allowing for reflection upon both imaginable and unimaginable states of awareness, aka dreams - whose results of which are entirely dependent upon how deep you go “down the rabbit hole” (choice).
By means of iteration (self-similarity) the perimeter of every fractal set will eventually enlarge and develop beyond a measurable dimension. The equation is recursive, a perpetual constant, a design that invites and embraces change amidst the potential of traveling beyond the constraints of three dimensional space/time.
Fractals are metaphors for what might be characterized as an "on going evolutionary design process". Circumstances change in the moment (space/time) only if the observer is keenly aware and attuned to it. There are countless numbers of facets, iterations, forms and pools generated about every source/algorithm. Every algorithm is designed to generate a series of mathematical “likenesses” emerging as result of a repetitive/cyclical process or directive.
Life presents itself to us in a fractal and cyclical manner; chaotic yet patterned, always changing yet unchanged, hidden yet always evident, finite yet expansive, unseen yet seen, unmeasurable yet quantifiable, progressive yet regressive, periodical yet timeless.
* * *
Strange Stars Pulse to the Golden Mean
Natalie Wolchover
Mathematicians in the 1970s used attractors to model the behavior of chaotic systems like the weather, and they found that the future path of such a system through its attractor is extremely dependent on its exact starting point. This sensitivity to initial conditions, known as the butterfly effect, makes the behavior of chaotic systems unpredictable; you can’t tell the forecast very far in advance if the flap of a butterfly’s wings today can make the difference, two weeks from now, between sunshine and a hurricane. The infinitely detailed paths that most chaotic systems take through their attractors are called “fractals.”
https://www.quantamagazine.org/variable-stars-have-strange-nonchaotic-attractors-20150310
* * *
\
At some juncture in the iterative process the two-dimensional "shape" must overlap within the threshold of three-dimensional "form". Shapes, forms, patterns and configurations of energy in motion can be described and contained within the shape of a circle (2D, linear time, Euclidian, Classic) the form of a sphere (3D, linear time, Platonic) and multidimensionality (MD, timeless, Quantum).
“Quantum networks use uniquely quantum phenomena, like superposition, no-cloning, and entanglement that are not available to classical networks. Before the photon is measured, it exists in a superposition of all its possible quantum states, each with a corresponding probability. Measurement selects one among these states. In fact, the photon’s quantum state cannot be measured without causing a disturbance that betrays the attempt. Nor can an arbitrary, unknown quantum state be copied – no cloning allowed. A properly designed and operated quantum network derives inherent security from this behavior.
The strengths of quantum networks are complementary to those of classical networks. We will reap the greatest benefit in the long run by incorporating both classical and quantum networks in an internet with capabilities that exceed what is possible with either technology on its own.”
Science Made Simple: What are Quantum Networks?
Every fractal set reveals a circumstance, a pattern and a context within a quantum field of virtual potential made apparent as result of linear thinking. Every fractal set clears the slate by symbolically capturing time into a visual pattern of energy for the purpose of iteration, deviation, expansion and observation. Every fractal set locks time into a patterned moment while simultaneously piercing a timeless unknown.
Fractal sets of energy generate a series of cyclical patterns that display a progressive sequence of intermediate dimensions, each "state" describing a form of energy in transition and transformation. Every cycle is conceptual, i.e. infinite, every iteration linear and sequential.
Randomness, mutation, transformation, transition, adaptation, adjustment, revision, transfiguration, transmutation, i.e. change, all describe the attributable qualities of a multidimensional POV. Fractal geometry describes a metaphorical series of events that when subconsciously and symbolically "observed" bring light to the importance of change and what it means to be design conscious.
The multiverses describe “ten thousand things” by virtue of symbol and metaphor. The Tao remains changeless, beyond Source without identification.
To be design conscious you must be more than an observer.
"To believe is to accept another's truth. To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited: 08.05.2021, 08.12.2021, 09.01.2021, 01.06.2022, 01.28.2022, 03.15.2022, 04.21.2022, 05.19.2022, 08.11.2023, 08.19.2023
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/ is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2023 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice) AI usage prohibited. You are also invited to visit https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ and https://sagariandesignnetwork.blogspot.com and https://www.pinterest.com
No comments:
Post a Comment